<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A Serial Killer Film the Way I Want To See a Serial Killer Film</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thisdistractedglobe.com/2009/09/27/surveillance/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thisdistractedglobe.com/2009/09/27/surveillance/</link>
	<description>Film reviews and commentary tonight, before I forget tomorrow</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 May 2012 23:29:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe Valdez</title>
		<link>http://thisdistractedglobe.com/2009/09/27/surveillance/comment-page-1/#comment-7468</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe Valdez</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2009 23:47:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thisdistractedglobe.com/?p=5470#comment-7468</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;&quot;Fred&quot;&lt;/strong&gt;: I&#039;ll share your grievances with The New York Times and The Guardian. That&#039;s where the information you found wrong in this article is coming from. In terms of the budget, I don&#039;t have any idea what it really was. &lt;a href=http://www.screendaily.com/lago-weighs-in-on-lynchs-surveillance/4025350.articl rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Screen Daily&lt;/a&gt; announced that Lago had agreed to bankroll a budget of $10 million, while &lt;a href=http://http://www.darkhorizons.com/films/489/Surveillance rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Dark Horizons&lt;/a&gt; later revised it down to $3.5 million. I&#039;ll bet the truth is closer to your projection, but it&#039;s not like budgets in Hollywood are anything other than a shell game. I try to remain less than definitive on the matter. Read the article again and let me know if you disagree. 

&lt;strong&gt;Patrick&lt;/strong&gt;: You probably haven&#039;t seen her movies, but Jennifer Lynch&#039;s comment about poetry slams is far from the strangest aspect of her story. Actually, a movie about poetry slams would have been a much, much better idea than &lt;em&gt;Surveillance&lt;/em&gt;. Thanks for commenting!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>&#8220;Fred&#8221;</strong>: I&#8217;ll share your grievances with The New York Times and The Guardian. That&#8217;s where the information you found wrong in this article is coming from. In terms of the budget, I don&#8217;t have any idea what it really was. <a href=http://www.screendaily.com/lago-weighs-in-on-lynchs-surveillance/4025350.articl rel="nofollow">Screen Daily</a> announced that Lago had agreed to bankroll a budget of $10 million, while <a href=http://http://www.darkhorizons.com/films/489/Surveillance rel="nofollow">Dark Horizons</a> later revised it down to $3.5 million. I&#8217;ll bet the truth is closer to your projection, but it&#8217;s not like budgets in Hollywood are anything other than a shell game. I try to remain less than definitive on the matter. Read the article again and let me know if you disagree. </p>
<p><strong>Patrick</strong>: You probably haven&#8217;t seen her movies, but Jennifer Lynch&#8217;s comment about poetry slams is far from the strangest aspect of her story. Actually, a movie about poetry slams would have been a much, much better idea than <em>Surveillance</em>. Thanks for commenting!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patrick</title>
		<link>http://thisdistractedglobe.com/2009/09/27/surveillance/comment-page-1/#comment-7465</link>
		<dc:creator>Patrick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2009 05:16:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thisdistractedglobe.com/?p=5470#comment-7465</guid>
		<description>The comment about reading poetry seems somewhat strange.  I&#039;m guessing she means she was a little detached from the real world, or that she had poorly developed critical skills, and from a present day vantage point is looking down on herself at that point in her life, but it&#039;s not clear quite why she should imply that reading poetry in itself is a bad thing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The comment about reading poetry seems somewhat strange.  I&#8217;m guessing she means she was a little detached from the real world, or that she had poorly developed critical skills, and from a present day vantage point is looking down on herself at that point in her life, but it&#8217;s not clear quite why she should imply that reading poetry in itself is a bad thing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fred</title>
		<link>http://thisdistractedglobe.com/2009/09/27/surveillance/comment-page-1/#comment-7458</link>
		<dc:creator>fred</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Sep 2009 13:48:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thisdistractedglobe.com/?p=5470#comment-7458</guid>
		<description>There is a lot of  wrong information in this blog.  The film was no where even close to a  10 million dollar budget.  The final budget was under $5 million.  There are a few other little errors in here, however the budget error is really way way off.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is a lot of  wrong information in this blog.  The film was no where even close to a  10 million dollar budget.  The final budget was under $5 million.  There are a few other little errors in here, however the budget error is really way way off.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

