<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Return To Oz (1985)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thisdistractedglobe.com/2008/11/10/return-to-oz-1985/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thisdistractedglobe.com/2008/11/10/return-to-oz-1985/</link>
	<description>Film reviews and commentary tonight, before I forget tomorrow</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 17:21:30 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Deepanjana</title>
		<link>http://thisdistractedglobe.com/2008/11/10/return-to-oz-1985/comment-page-1/#comment-7362</link>
		<dc:creator>Deepanjana</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2009 13:54:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thisdistractedglobe.com/?p=3952#comment-7362</guid>
		<description>Hi... I was looking for a view on Dorothy&#039;s condition in Return to Oz which is how I chanced upon your blog. 
I am an Indian and born when this movie was released, considering how obscure this movie is I dont know how we had a video of this at my home in India. Anyway, I was in love with the film as a kid and I dont think it scared me at all apart from the wheelers, but it never really left a nightmarish effect on me!
I watched it again about 10 yrs later and I found it just as fascinating as when I was a kid. Only this time I found a darker and melancholic feel to it. 
Saying which I think this movie is as much for adults as for kids, because sometimes adults need their doze of imagination too. I think you wrote a great piece on the movie and I really hope more people read it. especially the Return to Oz cynics!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi&#8230; I was looking for a view on Dorothy&#8217;s condition in Return to Oz which is how I chanced upon your blog.<br />
I am an Indian and born when this movie was released, considering how obscure this movie is I dont know how we had a video of this at my home in India. Anyway, I was in love with the film as a kid and I dont think it scared me at all apart from the wheelers, but it never really left a nightmarish effect on me!<br />
I watched it again about 10 yrs later and I found it just as fascinating as when I was a kid. Only this time I found a darker and melancholic feel to it.<br />
Saying which I think this movie is as much for adults as for kids, because sometimes adults need their doze of imagination too. I think you wrote a great piece on the movie and I really hope more people read it. especially the Return to Oz cynics!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe Valdez</title>
		<link>http://thisdistractedglobe.com/2008/11/10/return-to-oz-1985/comment-page-1/#comment-6628</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe Valdez</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 07:01:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thisdistractedglobe.com/?p=3952#comment-6628</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;AR&lt;/strong&gt;: I&#039;m baffled by those who fault Walter Murch as a first-time director here. If anyone knows how a movie should look and sound, it&#039;s him, and the overall design is exquisite. Disney made a number of dark, live action films, 1978-85 before the days of Eisner, and this is my favorite. Thanks for commenting!

&lt;strong&gt;Daniel&lt;/strong&gt;: The only thing Gene Siskel liked about &lt;em&gt;Return To Oz&lt;/em&gt; was the claymation. Had Disney provided some context in preparing people for what the movie was, it would have fared much better. I think the ideal audience is anyone who enjoys &lt;em&gt;The Nightmare Before Christmas&lt;/em&gt; and is looking for something that pushes the children&#039;s film into even darker territory.

&lt;strong&gt;Patricia&lt;/strong&gt;: Well said. Your comment touches on all the reasons I love this film. I think audiences can accept more than one version or take on a story. Probably not right away, especially if we&#039;re talking about an institution like &lt;em&gt;The Wizard of Oz&lt;/em&gt;, but &lt;em&gt;Return To Oz&lt;/em&gt; is one of the great cult classics of the 1980s.

&lt;strong&gt;Monte&lt;/strong&gt;: Thanks for commenting! I felt Maguire spent way too much time on political mechanization. It was a serious case of &lt;em&gt;The Phantom Menace&lt;/em&gt; all over again. Some people love that stuff, but I look for a well told tale and characters and felt &lt;em&gt;Wicked&lt;/em&gt; was a bit wooden. I didn&#039;t find the book magical or mysterious for something set in Oz. The relationship between the Witch and Glinda had potential and I understand why a lot of women responded to the novel, but I felt it missed the mark.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>AR</strong>: I&#8217;m baffled by those who fault Walter Murch as a first-time director here. If anyone knows how a movie should look and sound, it&#8217;s him, and the overall design is exquisite. Disney made a number of dark, live action films, 1978-85 before the days of Eisner, and this is my favorite. Thanks for commenting!</p>
<p><strong>Daniel</strong>: The only thing Gene Siskel liked about <em>Return To Oz</em> was the claymation. Had Disney provided some context in preparing people for what the movie was, it would have fared much better. I think the ideal audience is anyone who enjoys <em>The Nightmare Before Christmas</em> and is looking for something that pushes the children&#8217;s film into even darker territory.</p>
<p><strong>Patricia</strong>: Well said. Your comment touches on all the reasons I love this film. I think audiences can accept more than one version or take on a story. Probably not right away, especially if we&#8217;re talking about an institution like <em>The Wizard of Oz</em>, but <em>Return To Oz</em> is one of the great cult classics of the 1980s.</p>
<p><strong>Monte</strong>: Thanks for commenting! I felt Maguire spent way too much time on political mechanization. It was a serious case of <em>The Phantom Menace</em> all over again. Some people love that stuff, but I look for a well told tale and characters and felt <em>Wicked</em> was a bit wooden. I didn&#8217;t find the book magical or mysterious for something set in Oz. The relationship between the Witch and Glinda had potential and I understand why a lot of women responded to the novel, but I felt it missed the mark.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Monte</title>
		<link>http://thisdistractedglobe.com/2008/11/10/return-to-oz-1985/comment-page-1/#comment-6627</link>
		<dc:creator>Monte</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 06:52:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thisdistractedglobe.com/?p=3952#comment-6627</guid>
		<description>Return to OZ is lovely to look at, but I found the story clumsy and most of the acting unconvincing.

Joe, what do you think of Gregory Maguire&#039;s WICKED?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Return to OZ is lovely to look at, but I found the story clumsy and most of the acting unconvincing.</p>
<p>Joe, what do you think of Gregory Maguire&#8217;s WICKED?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pat Evans</title>
		<link>http://thisdistractedglobe.com/2008/11/10/return-to-oz-1985/comment-page-1/#comment-6502</link>
		<dc:creator>Pat Evans</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 10:21:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thisdistractedglobe.com/?p=3952#comment-6502</guid>
		<description>However much one loves the original Oz film, there is no reason whatsoever to dismiss this very dark Oz variation.  I&#039;ve watched it a number of times and it more than holds up equally well, with a sparkling turn from young Balk (her adult roles have been something of a disappointment) and a wonderful sense of a different fantasy world.  The film will never achieve the same classic status, especially as it is even more frightening than the original for wee kiddies, but it does offer a great deal for the older viewer (including adults who relish the darker side of things).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>However much one loves the original Oz film, there is no reason whatsoever to dismiss this very dark Oz variation.  I&#8217;ve watched it a number of times and it more than holds up equally well, with a sparkling turn from young Balk (her adult roles have been something of a disappointment) and a wonderful sense of a different fantasy world.  The film will never achieve the same classic status, especially as it is even more frightening than the original for wee kiddies, but it does offer a great deal for the older viewer (including adults who relish the darker side of things).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel</title>
		<link>http://thisdistractedglobe.com/2008/11/10/return-to-oz-1985/comment-page-1/#comment-6409</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2008 20:09:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thisdistractedglobe.com/?p=3952#comment-6409</guid>
		<description>Great one, Joe! I remember you mentioning that you liked it when I featured it as an &quot;underrated movie&quot; this summer. For all the same reasons you say, especially about Murch being ahead of his time, I do my best to make people aware of this.

I wonder, though, if people would &quot;get it&quot; if they were to see it for the first time now. Many people aren&#039;t used to claymation, for example, and could get turned off my the effects (which I think are outstanding). Anyway, glad to see this get more positive attention!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great one, Joe! I remember you mentioning that you liked it when I featured it as an &#8220;underrated movie&#8221; this summer. For all the same reasons you say, especially about Murch being ahead of his time, I do my best to make people aware of this.</p>
<p>I wonder, though, if people would &#8220;get it&#8221; if they were to see it for the first time now. Many people aren&#8217;t used to claymation, for example, and could get turned off my the effects (which I think are outstanding). Anyway, glad to see this get more positive attention!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AR</title>
		<link>http://thisdistractedglobe.com/2008/11/10/return-to-oz-1985/comment-page-1/#comment-6406</link>
		<dc:creator>AR</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2008 19:09:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thisdistractedglobe.com/?p=3952#comment-6406</guid>
		<description>I liked this movie as a kid, even though it&#039;s in the class of films that scared me a little.  I&#039;m not sure when I watched it again many years ago as an adult it really quite held up.  I do still appreciate the fact that it&#039;s a bit dark, as well as the production design.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I liked this movie as a kid, even though it&#8217;s in the class of films that scared me a little.  I&#8217;m not sure when I watched it again many years ago as an adult it really quite held up.  I do still appreciate the fact that it&#8217;s a bit dark, as well as the production design.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
