<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sideways (2004)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thisdistractedglobe.com/2008/05/21/sideways-2004/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thisdistractedglobe.com/2008/05/21/sideways-2004/</link>
	<description>Film reviews and commentary tonight, before I forget tomorrow</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 May 2012 23:29:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pat Evans</title>
		<link>http://thisdistractedglobe.com/2008/05/21/sideways-2004/comment-page-1/#comment-5003</link>
		<dc:creator>Pat Evans</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 May 2008 05:20:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thisdistractedglobe.com/2008/05/21/sideways-2004/#comment-5003</guid>
		<description>This is one great little movie which will live on as a cult favorite for many viewers, while others will remain impervious to its charms. Small, character-driven films are not for everyone -- nor should they be.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is one great little movie which will live on as a cult favorite for many viewers, while others will remain impervious to its charms. Small, character-driven films are not for everyone &#8212; nor should they be.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel</title>
		<link>http://thisdistractedglobe.com/2008/05/21/sideways-2004/comment-page-1/#comment-4981</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 May 2008 22:19:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thisdistractedglobe.com/2008/05/21/sideways-2004/#comment-4981</guid>
		<description>I like Sideways more and more with each viewing. I really can&#039;t relate to any of the characters, but it&#039;s enough just to watch Giamatti and Haden Church together. Any other casting choice may have sunk this gem.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like Sideways more and more with each viewing. I really can&#8217;t relate to any of the characters, but it&#8217;s enough just to watch Giamatti and Haden Church together. Any other casting choice may have sunk this gem.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AR</title>
		<link>http://thisdistractedglobe.com/2008/05/21/sideways-2004/comment-page-1/#comment-4980</link>
		<dc:creator>AR</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 May 2008 21:26:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thisdistractedglobe.com/2008/05/21/sideways-2004/#comment-4980</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Lost in Translation&lt;/i&gt; is a comedy?  I thought it was a drama, but I liked it more than &lt;i&gt;Sideways&lt;/i&gt;.
&lt;i&gt;Wedding Crashers&lt;/i&gt;, no comment.  Haven&#039;t seen it, not desperate to see it any time soon.
The only recent comedy I&#039;ve seen that I&#039;ve really deeply liked is &lt;i&gt;The 40 Year Old Virgin&lt;/i&gt;.  Does that make it better?  I&#039;m not sure.  I think I could say that &lt;i&gt;Sideways&lt;/i&gt; is more obviously well crafted and thoughtful.

Recalling some of my issues, while I choose not to speculate about Payne and Oh&#039;s relationship, I did find Oh&#039;s reaction cliched and awfully hasty for one night&#039;s worth of romance.  Was the characterization of the chubby waitress and her cuckolded husband really that deep?  The resolution with Madsen&#039;s character leaving that message...I dunno if that really worked for me.
I do think the critics lavished praise for the reasons laid out by Payne.  It&#039;s not a slick movie, it takes its time, it focuses more on characters than action.  That sort of thing is such a rarity these days that when people see it they sometimes get over-zealous in their excitement.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Lost in Translation</i> is a comedy?  I thought it was a drama, but I liked it more than <i>Sideways</i>.<br />
<i>Wedding Crashers</i>, no comment.  Haven&#8217;t seen it, not desperate to see it any time soon.<br />
The only recent comedy I&#8217;ve seen that I&#8217;ve really deeply liked is <i>The 40 Year Old Virgin</i>.  Does that make it better?  I&#8217;m not sure.  I think I could say that <i>Sideways</i> is more obviously well crafted and thoughtful.</p>
<p>Recalling some of my issues, while I choose not to speculate about Payne and Oh&#8217;s relationship, I did find Oh&#8217;s reaction cliched and awfully hasty for one night&#8217;s worth of romance.  Was the characterization of the chubby waitress and her cuckolded husband really that deep?  The resolution with Madsen&#8217;s character leaving that message&#8230;I dunno if that really worked for me.<br />
I do think the critics lavished praise for the reasons laid out by Payne.  It&#8217;s not a slick movie, it takes its time, it focuses more on characters than action.  That sort of thing is such a rarity these days that when people see it they sometimes get over-zealous in their excitement.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marilyn</title>
		<link>http://thisdistractedglobe.com/2008/05/21/sideways-2004/comment-page-1/#comment-4972</link>
		<dc:creator>Marilyn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 May 2008 18:04:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thisdistractedglobe.com/2008/05/21/sideways-2004/#comment-4972</guid>
		<description>Yuppie isn&#039;t exactly a demographic to me--it&#039;s a state of mind. Madsen certainly played a well-fleshed character, but I felt like Payne was making Oh into a caricature, particularly with her bashing Haden-Church with her helmet. Damn, she almost killed him! There was trouble in the Payne/Oh marriage that made its way to the screen.

Oh, and has Madsen had another great role since then? Sexism in the industry cancels out sexism on the screen in this case, though that&#039;s not the fault of the movie, of course.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yuppie isn&#8217;t exactly a demographic to me&#8211;it&#8217;s a state of mind. Madsen certainly played a well-fleshed character, but I felt like Payne was making Oh into a caricature, particularly with her bashing Haden-Church with her helmet. Damn, she almost killed him! There was trouble in the Payne/Oh marriage that made its way to the screen.</p>
<p>Oh, and has Madsen had another great role since then? Sexism in the industry cancels out sexism on the screen in this case, though that&#8217;s not the fault of the movie, of course.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe Valdez</title>
		<link>http://thisdistractedglobe.com/2008/05/21/sideways-2004/comment-page-1/#comment-4959</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe Valdez</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 May 2008 02:28:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thisdistractedglobe.com/2008/05/21/sideways-2004/#comment-4959</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Joseph:&lt;/strong&gt; The drunk dialing of the ex-wife was my favorite scene. It&#039;s so easy to imagine the bad version of that scene in some dumb romantic comedy. Here was a movie that instead of going to the audience, asked the audience come to it, if that makes sense.

&lt;strong&gt;Chuck:&lt;/strong&gt; I think you have to credit Rex Pickett. As a guy, I have gone through my occasional Miles moment I&#039;m not happy to say - like the encounter with the ex - but it&#039;s so rare you see that captured in fiction in a believable way. I can&#039;t believe I still haven&#039;t seen &lt;em&gt;About Schmidt&lt;/em&gt;. Thanks for giving me another rental idea and for commenting!

&lt;strong&gt;Marilyn:&lt;/strong&gt; I didn&#039;t get the sense this movie had anything to do with Yuppies. Neither Miles or Jack are exactly young and they&#039;re certainly not professionals; they&#039;re pretty much losers in their careers and life. I&#039;m surprised you felt there was a chauvinist slant here. I thought the female characters were imbued with a genuine voice and strength and one of the female reviewers I mention did as well.

&lt;strong&gt;AR&lt;/strong&gt;: Yeah, I think maybe if you substitute &quot;wine&quot; with &quot;film&quot; a lot of critics could see themselves as Miles, particularly in the looks department. This could be one reason why all the reviews were so positive. However, I don&#039;t know how many other recent comedies you could say were better than this one. &lt;em&gt;Lost In Translation&lt;/em&gt;? &lt;em&gt;Wedding Crashers&lt;/em&gt;? Those to me were vastly overrated.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Joseph:</strong> The drunk dialing of the ex-wife was my favorite scene. It&#8217;s so easy to imagine the bad version of that scene in some dumb romantic comedy. Here was a movie that instead of going to the audience, asked the audience come to it, if that makes sense.</p>
<p><strong>Chuck:</strong> I think you have to credit Rex Pickett. As a guy, I have gone through my occasional Miles moment I&#8217;m not happy to say &#8211; like the encounter with the ex &#8211; but it&#8217;s so rare you see that captured in fiction in a believable way. I can&#8217;t believe I still haven&#8217;t seen <em>About Schmidt</em>. Thanks for giving me another rental idea and for commenting!</p>
<p><strong>Marilyn:</strong> I didn&#8217;t get the sense this movie had anything to do with Yuppies. Neither Miles or Jack are exactly young and they&#8217;re certainly not professionals; they&#8217;re pretty much losers in their careers and life. I&#8217;m surprised you felt there was a chauvinist slant here. I thought the female characters were imbued with a genuine voice and strength and one of the female reviewers I mention did as well.</p>
<p><strong>AR</strong>: Yeah, I think maybe if you substitute &#8220;wine&#8221; with &#8220;film&#8221; a lot of critics could see themselves as Miles, particularly in the looks department. This could be one reason why all the reviews were so positive. However, I don&#8217;t know how many other recent comedies you could say were better than this one. <em>Lost In Translation</em>? <em>Wedding Crashers</em>? Those to me were vastly overrated.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AR</title>
		<link>http://thisdistractedglobe.com/2008/05/21/sideways-2004/comment-page-1/#comment-4956</link>
		<dc:creator>AR</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 May 2008 23:15:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thisdistractedglobe.com/2008/05/21/sideways-2004/#comment-4956</guid>
		<description>I personally found this film highly overrated, though I&#039;ll grant that it had reasonably good dialogue and was altogether well made.  It&#039;s been a few years since I&#039;ve seen it, so I&#039;d need to refresh my memory regarding the details as to why.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I personally found this film highly overrated, though I&#8217;ll grant that it had reasonably good dialogue and was altogether well made.  It&#8217;s been a few years since I&#8217;ve seen it, so I&#8217;d need to refresh my memory regarding the details as to why.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marilyn</title>
		<link>http://thisdistractedglobe.com/2008/05/21/sideways-2004/comment-page-1/#comment-4937</link>
		<dc:creator>Marilyn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 May 2008 17:25:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thisdistractedglobe.com/2008/05/21/sideways-2004/#comment-4937</guid>
		<description>I have to admit that neither the hubby nor I liked &lt;i&gt;Sideways&lt;/i&gt;. Yes, I know that yuppies---somewhere down there--are people, too. But neither of us could get away from the idea that this was just another one of their facile attempts at being real. I am glad it catapulted Paul Giamatti into a real career, but that&#039;s about all I can say for it. Photographing Oh with her legs in the air was an unnecessarily humiliating way for Payne to deal with her character - no wonder they&#039;re divorced now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have to admit that neither the hubby nor I liked <i>Sideways</i>. Yes, I know that yuppies&#8212;somewhere down there&#8211;are people, too. But neither of us could get away from the idea that this was just another one of their facile attempts at being real. I am glad it catapulted Paul Giamatti into a real career, but that&#8217;s about all I can say for it. Photographing Oh with her legs in the air was an unnecessarily humiliating way for Payne to deal with her character &#8211; no wonder they&#8217;re divorced now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chuck</title>
		<link>http://thisdistractedglobe.com/2008/05/21/sideways-2004/comment-page-1/#comment-4925</link>
		<dc:creator>Chuck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 May 2008 16:24:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thisdistractedglobe.com/2008/05/21/sideways-2004/#comment-4925</guid>
		<description>Sideways is one of the few modern movies that I&#039;m comfortable calling one of my favorite movies (period). It&#039;s warm, generous, human, and, while I love Payne&#039;s work in general (excluding Citizen Ruth which I find overrated) Sideways represents major growth, particularly in spirit. Schmidt is tremendously moving (love that ending) but Payne cheats a little in the portrayal of many of the side characters, retreating into caricature. Sideways plays fair from start to finish, with four rich, off the path performances that refuse to highlight for the cheap seats. Favorite moments? Virtually every scene in the movie-but a major devastater is Miles&#039; ex-wife&#039;s revelation that she&#039;s pregnant-Giamatti&#039;s face crumbles, briefly, swallowing the disappointment, and moves on. Or how about him drinking the wine in the burger place?

The ending is even nearly as devastating a promise of hope amongst hopelessness as Schmidt&#039;s, and tremendously earned. A masterpiece. Thank you for this coverage.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sideways is one of the few modern movies that I&#8217;m comfortable calling one of my favorite movies (period). It&#8217;s warm, generous, human, and, while I love Payne&#8217;s work in general (excluding Citizen Ruth which I find overrated) Sideways represents major growth, particularly in spirit. Schmidt is tremendously moving (love that ending) but Payne cheats a little in the portrayal of many of the side characters, retreating into caricature. Sideways plays fair from start to finish, with four rich, off the path performances that refuse to highlight for the cheap seats. Favorite moments? Virtually every scene in the movie-but a major devastater is Miles&#8217; ex-wife&#8217;s revelation that she&#8217;s pregnant-Giamatti&#8217;s face crumbles, briefly, swallowing the disappointment, and moves on. Or how about him drinking the wine in the burger place?</p>
<p>The ending is even nearly as devastating a promise of hope amongst hopelessness as Schmidt&#8217;s, and tremendously earned. A masterpiece. Thank you for this coverage.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joseph</title>
		<link>http://thisdistractedglobe.com/2008/05/21/sideways-2004/comment-page-1/#comment-4919</link>
		<dc:creator>Joseph</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 May 2008 02:09:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thisdistractedglobe.com/2008/05/21/sideways-2004/#comment-4919</guid>
		<description>Sideways is a gem of a film that I picked up for 50 cents at the library. It hit me on so many levels throughout the film. Great characters, especially contrasting characteristics between them.

That scene that always gets me is the conversation between Paul Giamatti and Virginia Madsen outside during the double date. Over-the-top symbolic parallels, but I love it. :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sideways is a gem of a film that I picked up for 50 cents at the library. It hit me on so many levels throughout the film. Great characters, especially contrasting characteristics between them.</p>
<p>That scene that always gets me is the conversation between Paul Giamatti and Virginia Madsen outside during the double date. Over-the-top symbolic parallels, but I love it. <img src='http://thisdistractedglobe.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

