<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Trouble With Harry (1955)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thisdistractedglobe.com/2007/10/27/the-trouble-with-harry-1955/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thisdistractedglobe.com/2007/10/27/the-trouble-with-harry-1955/</link>
	<description>Film reviews and commentary tonight, before I forget tomorrow</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 May 2012 03:27:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe Valdez</title>
		<link>http://thisdistractedglobe.com/2007/10/27/the-trouble-with-harry-1955/comment-page-1/#comment-2168</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe Valdez</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Oct 2007 01:13:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thisdistractedglobe.com/2007/10/27/the-trouble-with-harry-1955/#comment-2168</guid>
		<description>Adam: Shirley MacLaine has had an interesting career. She seemed to go from kooky roles in her youth to kooky grandmother roles overnight. I donâ€™t recall her giving a bad performance though, and sheâ€™s irresistibly cute in this movie.

Damian: I&#039;m sure Hitchcock intended &lt;em&gt;The Trouble With Harry&lt;/em&gt; to say nothing and prove nothing, but at 100 minutes, it is harmless. As a film music fan I have a feeling you will enjoy Bernard Herrmann&#039;s wonderful score here at the very least.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Adam: Shirley MacLaine has had an interesting career. She seemed to go from kooky roles in her youth to kooky grandmother roles overnight. I donâ€™t recall her giving a bad performance though, and sheâ€™s irresistibly cute in this movie.</p>
<p>Damian: I&#8217;m sure Hitchcock intended <em>The Trouble With Harry</em> to say nothing and prove nothing, but at 100 minutes, it is harmless. As a film music fan I have a feeling you will enjoy Bernard Herrmann&#8217;s wonderful score here at the very least.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Damian</title>
		<link>http://thisdistractedglobe.com/2007/10/27/the-trouble-with-harry-1955/comment-page-1/#comment-2164</link>
		<dc:creator>Damian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Oct 2007 23:41:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thisdistractedglobe.com/2007/10/27/the-trouble-with-harry-1955/#comment-2164</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t have much to say here as this is one of the few Hitchcock films that I&#039;ve not yet seen. It always looked like &quot;Hitch lite&quot; to me, but then again I really loved &lt;i&gt;Family Plot&lt;/i&gt; (another example of &quot;lesser Hitccock&quot; but which turned out IMO to be thoroughly delightful), so there was a good chance I&#039;d enjoy &lt;i&gt;Trouble with Harry&lt;/i&gt; as well. As a Hitchcock completist I know I shall have to see it someday but--based on your remarks, Joe--I shall keep my expectations low.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t have much to say here as this is one of the few Hitchcock films that I&#8217;ve not yet seen. It always looked like &#8220;Hitch lite&#8221; to me, but then again I really loved <i>Family Plot</i> (another example of &#8220;lesser Hitccock&#8221; but which turned out IMO to be thoroughly delightful), so there was a good chance I&#8217;d enjoy <i>Trouble with Harry</i> as well. As a Hitchcock completist I know I shall have to see it someday but&#8211;based on your remarks, Joe&#8211;I shall keep my expectations low.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam Ross</title>
		<link>http://thisdistractedglobe.com/2007/10/27/the-trouble-with-harry-1955/comment-page-1/#comment-2144</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam Ross</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Oct 2007 06:14:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thisdistractedglobe.com/2007/10/27/the-trouble-with-harry-1955/#comment-2144</guid>
		<description>I love Shirley MacClaine in this -- and John Forsythe, silliness and all. I love the bit with the body in the house, it seems like something from a Neil Simon play.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love Shirley MacClaine in this &#8212; and John Forsythe, silliness and all. I love the bit with the body in the house, it seems like something from a Neil Simon play.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

