<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Foreign Correspondent (1940)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thisdistractedglobe.com/2007/10/14/foreign-correspondent-1940/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thisdistractedglobe.com/2007/10/14/foreign-correspondent-1940/</link>
	<description>Film reviews and commentary tonight, before I forget tomorrow</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 17:21:30 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Joe Valdez</title>
		<link>http://thisdistractedglobe.com/2007/10/14/foreign-correspondent-1940/comment-page-1/#comment-1892</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe Valdez</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Oct 2007 20:47:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thisdistractedglobe.com/2007/10/14/foreign-correspondent-1940/#comment-1892</guid>
		<description>Dave: Thanks for pointing that out. I doubt all critics vote as a bloc, even in circumstances similar to the one in England in 1940.

Damian: This is such a fantastic movie! It could have been a serious political thriller, or a comic romp, but the way the script manages to do both is something Iâ€™m truly in awe of as a writer. It goes to show that sometimes a movie written by committee can be a masterpiece too. Thanks for commenting. Iâ€™m really curious which image youâ€™d choose to illustrate your site with.

Megan: I agree with you completely about George Sanders. The phrase â€œcheeky bastardâ€ seems invented specifically for him. 

Pat: Hitchcock&#039;s decision to show the plummeting body and not clue us in until the next scene whether it was McCrea or Gwenn seems so simple, yet it really made for brilliant suspense. p.s. You were successful tonight. Receiving a comment from you across the Atlantic and through the spam filters is always a treat.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dave: Thanks for pointing that out. I doubt all critics vote as a bloc, even in circumstances similar to the one in England in 1940.</p>
<p>Damian: This is such a fantastic movie! It could have been a serious political thriller, or a comic romp, but the way the script manages to do both is something Iâ€™m truly in awe of as a writer. It goes to show that sometimes a movie written by committee can be a masterpiece too. Thanks for commenting. Iâ€™m really curious which image youâ€™d choose to illustrate your site with.</p>
<p>Megan: I agree with you completely about George Sanders. The phrase â€œcheeky bastardâ€ seems invented specifically for him. </p>
<p>Pat: Hitchcock&#8217;s decision to show the plummeting body and not clue us in until the next scene whether it was McCrea or Gwenn seems so simple, yet it really made for brilliant suspense. p.s. You were successful tonight. Receiving a comment from you across the Atlantic and through the spam filters is always a treat.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pat Evans</title>
		<link>http://thisdistractedglobe.com/2007/10/14/foreign-correspondent-1940/comment-page-1/#comment-1891</link>
		<dc:creator>Pat Evans</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Oct 2007 20:36:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thisdistractedglobe.com/2007/10/14/foreign-correspondent-1940/#comment-1891</guid>
		<description>Let&#039;s see if your spam filter hates me today too.  I love this movie particularly with its offbeat casting: having very suave Herbert Marshall as the big baddie and everyone&#039;s favourite Kris Kringle, Edmund Gwenn, as a would-be assassin.  Good stuff!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Let&#8217;s see if your spam filter hates me today too.  I love this movie particularly with its offbeat casting: having very suave Herbert Marshall as the big baddie and everyone&#8217;s favourite Kris Kringle, Edmund Gwenn, as a would-be assassin.  Good stuff!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Megan</title>
		<link>http://thisdistractedglobe.com/2007/10/14/foreign-correspondent-1940/comment-page-1/#comment-1884</link>
		<dc:creator>Megan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Oct 2007 18:01:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thisdistractedglobe.com/2007/10/14/foreign-correspondent-1940/#comment-1884</guid>
		<description>I love George Sanders in this.  I remember the first time I saw it I thought for sure he was going to turn out to be a bad guy!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love George Sanders in this.  I remember the first time I saw it I thought for sure he was going to turn out to be a bad guy!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Damian</title>
		<link>http://thisdistractedglobe.com/2007/10/14/foreign-correspondent-1940/comment-page-1/#comment-1863</link>
		<dc:creator>Damian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Oct 2007 04:16:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thisdistractedglobe.com/2007/10/14/foreign-correspondent-1940/#comment-1863</guid>
		<description>I also saw &lt;i&gt;Foreign Correspondent&lt;/i&gt; for the first time recently and loved it. Your characterization of it as the &quot;lost gem of Hitch&#039;s career&quot; is quite apt, Joe. I even considered using a screenshot from it for my &quot;Windmills&quot; logo. Maybe I still will someday.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I also saw <i>Foreign Correspondent</i> for the first time recently and loved it. Your characterization of it as the &#8220;lost gem of Hitch&#8217;s career&#8221; is quite apt, Joe. I even considered using a screenshot from it for my &#8220;Windmills&#8221; logo. Maybe I still will someday.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Pattern</title>
		<link>http://thisdistractedglobe.com/2007/10/14/foreign-correspondent-1940/comment-page-1/#comment-1821</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Pattern</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Oct 2007 09:41:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thisdistractedglobe.com/2007/10/14/foreign-correspondent-1940/#comment-1821</guid>
		<description>Great review Joe -- the assassination in the rain scene is one of my favourite Hitchcock moments :-)

Out of interest, the British reviews weren&#039;t all chilled.  Although unusually brief (there was a war on and words were rationed!), the review in The Times was positive:

&quot;...first-rate tale of adventure&quot; 
http://www.hitchcockwiki.com/page/801

The reviews in the same newspaper for &quot;Rebecca&quot; and &quot;Suspicion&quot; were much less favourable.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great review Joe &#8212; the assassination in the rain scene is one of my favourite Hitchcock moments <img src='http://thisdistractedglobe.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Out of interest, the British reviews weren&#8217;t all chilled.  Although unusually brief (there was a war on and words were rationed!), the review in The Times was positive:</p>
<p>&#8220;&#8230;first-rate tale of adventure&#8221;<br />
<a href="http://www.hitchcockwiki.com/page/801" rel="nofollow">http://www.hitchcockwiki.com/page/801</a></p>
<p>The reviews in the same newspaper for &#8220;Rebecca&#8221; and &#8220;Suspicion&#8221; were much less favourable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
