<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Rebecca (1940)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thisdistractedglobe.com/2007/10/13/rebecca-1940/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thisdistractedglobe.com/2007/10/13/rebecca-1940/</link>
	<description>Film reviews and commentary tonight, before I forget tomorrow</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 May 2012 03:27:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jami</title>
		<link>http://thisdistractedglobe.com/2007/10/13/rebecca-1940/comment-page-1/#comment-4752</link>
		<dc:creator>Jami</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 May 2008 07:32:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thisdistractedglobe.com/2007/10/13/rebecca-1940/#comment-4752</guid>
		<description>Amazing movie. Rebecca is a masterpiece I will always treasure.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Amazing movie. Rebecca is a masterpiece I will always treasure.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Damian</title>
		<link>http://thisdistractedglobe.com/2007/10/13/rebecca-1940/comment-page-1/#comment-1870</link>
		<dc:creator>Damian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Oct 2007 05:06:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thisdistractedglobe.com/2007/10/13/rebecca-1940/#comment-1870</guid>
		<description>Like Megan, I first read DuMaurier&#039;s book when I was 8th grade BEFORE I saw the movie (one of the few times I&#039;ve ever done that) and like Megan I&#039;m not going to weigh in on the whole book vs. movie debate (I&#039;ve already said my piece on the subject in a post I made a while back). I will just say that I thought each was execllent in its own way.

One major change that I do recall *SPOILERS FOR THOSE WHO HAVEN&#039;T SEE THE MOVIE OR READ THE BOOK* was that in the original book Max actually murdered his first wife (he shot her as I recall) and hid her body, but for the movie Rebecca&#039;s death was an accident for which Max wasn&#039;t responsible. Nonetheless, fearing nobody would believe him he hid her body anyway. Thus, Hitch&#039;s usual theme of an &quot;innocent man being accused of a crime&quot; appears once again.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Like Megan, I first read DuMaurier&#8217;s book when I was 8th grade BEFORE I saw the movie (one of the few times I&#8217;ve ever done that) and like Megan I&#8217;m not going to weigh in on the whole book vs. movie debate (I&#8217;ve already said my piece on the subject in a post I made a while back). I will just say that I thought each was execllent in its own way.</p>
<p>One major change that I do recall *SPOILERS FOR THOSE WHO HAVEN&#8217;T SEE THE MOVIE OR READ THE BOOK* was that in the original book Max actually murdered his first wife (he shot her as I recall) and hid her body, but for the movie Rebecca&#8217;s death was an accident for which Max wasn&#8217;t responsible. Nonetheless, fearing nobody would believe him he hid her body anyway. Thus, Hitch&#8217;s usual theme of an &#8220;innocent man being accused of a crime&#8221; appears once again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe Valdez</title>
		<link>http://thisdistractedglobe.com/2007/10/13/rebecca-1940/comment-page-1/#comment-1869</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe Valdez</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Oct 2007 05:00:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thisdistractedglobe.com/2007/10/13/rebecca-1940/#comment-1869</guid>
		<description>Megan: Youâ€™re correct, &lt;em&gt;Jamaica Inn&lt;/em&gt; was Hitchcockâ€™s last film before moving to Hollywood. Donâ€™t worry, thereâ€™s no penalty for taking a couple of days to enter a comment here. I appreciate that someone was able to offer insight on du Maurierâ€™s book. Thanks!

Damian: Your comment about &quot;Hitch&#039;s usual theme&quot; is interesting because I think people read so much into Hitchcock&#039;s work. Sometimes they&#039;re seeing things Hitchcock may never have intended. 

I never read &lt;em&gt;Rebecca&lt;/em&gt;, but I understand that Hitchcock was under contract to film the book, and had little freedom to inject his own ideas into the film. Maybe Selznick was savvy enough to match his director with material that vaguely resembled the work he&#039;d done in England.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Megan: Youâ€™re correct, <em>Jamaica Inn</em> was Hitchcockâ€™s last film before moving to Hollywood. Donâ€™t worry, thereâ€™s no penalty for taking a couple of days to enter a comment here. I appreciate that someone was able to offer insight on du Maurierâ€™s book. Thanks!</p>
<p>Damian: Your comment about &#8220;Hitch&#8217;s usual theme&#8221; is interesting because I think people read so much into Hitchcock&#8217;s work. Sometimes they&#8217;re seeing things Hitchcock may never have intended. </p>
<p>I never read <em>Rebecca</em>, but I understand that Hitchcock was under contract to film the book, and had little freedom to inject his own ideas into the film. Maybe Selznick was savvy enough to match his director with material that vaguely resembled the work he&#8217;d done in England.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Megan</title>
		<link>http://thisdistractedglobe.com/2007/10/13/rebecca-1940/comment-page-1/#comment-1851</link>
		<dc:creator>Megan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2007 17:28:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thisdistractedglobe.com/2007/10/13/rebecca-1940/#comment-1851</guid>
		<description>Joe I am starting to fall behind.  Can&#039;t you just miss a day, darn you?!?

I read Rebecca when I was in the 8th grade, and first saw the movie not long after that.  I know the argument about book vs. movie has been done to death, but let me say that in this case (and Gone With the Wind is the only other example I can think of at the moment) the cast of the film match EXACTLY to the way I pictured them when I read DuMaurier&#039;s novel.  Also, I think this film absolutely nails the &#039;gothic&#039; atmosphere.  Way better than Jamaica Inn (which was also Hitchcock, wasn&#039;t it?).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Joe I am starting to fall behind.  Can&#8217;t you just miss a day, darn you?!?</p>
<p>I read Rebecca when I was in the 8th grade, and first saw the movie not long after that.  I know the argument about book vs. movie has been done to death, but let me say that in this case (and Gone With the Wind is the only other example I can think of at the moment) the cast of the film match EXACTLY to the way I pictured them when I read DuMaurier&#8217;s novel.  Also, I think this film absolutely nails the &#8216;gothic&#8217; atmosphere.  Way better than Jamaica Inn (which was also Hitchcock, wasn&#8217;t it?).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

