<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Dial M For Murder (1954)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thisdistractedglobe.com/2007/10/12/dial-m-for-murder-1954/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thisdistractedglobe.com/2007/10/12/dial-m-for-murder-1954/</link>
	<description>Film reviews and commentary tonight, before I forget tomorrow</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 23:14:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe Valdez</title>
		<link>http://thisdistractedglobe.com/2007/10/12/dial-m-for-murder-1954/comment-page-1/#comment-1872</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe Valdez</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Oct 2007 05:21:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thisdistractedglobe.com/2007/10/12/dial-m-for-murder-1954/#comment-1872</guid>
		<description>Jeff: I think you should schedule a series on this subgenre for your site at some future date. &lt;em&gt;War of the Roses&lt;/em&gt; comes to mind as the greatest â€œspouses plotting to murder each other movieâ€ ever made.

Pat: 3-D was the studioâ€™s idea to cash in on a craze. Hitchcock was under contract and not in a position to fight issues like that, but I agree that the movie has a glee to it that the remake did not. Thanks for your commentary and for increasing my British slang by another word!

Damian: Excellent comment. Francis Coppola was a theater director at heart, and I think his best films respect the tenure of stagecraft, with emphasis on the script and the actors, not camera lenses or special effects. I see Hitchcock possessing a similar sensibility, in spite of references he made over the years to screenwriters as &quot;stooges&quot; or actors as &quot;cattle&quot;. He respected stagecraft, but I get the impression he wanted a much wider audience than the theater would permit.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jeff: I think you should schedule a series on this subgenre for your site at some future date. <em>War of the Roses</em> comes to mind as the greatest â€œspouses plotting to murder each other movieâ€ ever made.</p>
<p>Pat: 3-D was the studioâ€™s idea to cash in on a craze. Hitchcock was under contract and not in a position to fight issues like that, but I agree that the movie has a glee to it that the remake did not. Thanks for your commentary and for increasing my British slang by another word!</p>
<p>Damian: Excellent comment. Francis Coppola was a theater director at heart, and I think his best films respect the tenure of stagecraft, with emphasis on the script and the actors, not camera lenses or special effects. I see Hitchcock possessing a similar sensibility, in spite of references he made over the years to screenwriters as &#8220;stooges&#8221; or actors as &#8220;cattle&#8221;. He respected stagecraft, but I get the impression he wanted a much wider audience than the theater would permit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Damian</title>
		<link>http://thisdistractedglobe.com/2007/10/12/dial-m-for-murder-1954/comment-page-1/#comment-1867</link>
		<dc:creator>Damian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Oct 2007 04:38:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thisdistractedglobe.com/2007/10/12/dial-m-for-murder-1954/#comment-1867</guid>
		<description>Movies like this one, &lt;i&gt;Lifeboat&lt;/i&gt; and &lt;i&gt;Rope&lt;/i&gt; sometimes make me wonder what Hitch would have been like as a stage director, because he seems to like working with single-set environments and/or claustrophpbic settings.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Movies like this one, <i>Lifeboat</i> and <i>Rope</i> sometimes make me wonder what Hitch would have been like as a stage director, because he seems to like working with single-set environments and/or claustrophpbic settings.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pat Evans</title>
		<link>http://thisdistractedglobe.com/2007/10/12/dial-m-for-murder-1954/comment-page-1/#comment-1837</link>
		<dc:creator>Pat Evans</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2007 08:57:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thisdistractedglobe.com/2007/10/12/dial-m-for-murder-1954/#comment-1837</guid>
		<description>A few years back someone thought it would be a wheeze to screen the 3-D version which frankly added absolutely nothing.  I am still fond of this movie although it certainly is a little stagey -- but when I saw the unnecessary remake, I appreciated it all the more.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A few years back someone thought it would be a wheeze to screen the 3-D version which frankly added absolutely nothing.  I am still fond of this movie although it certainly is a little stagey &#8212; but when I saw the unnecessary remake, I appreciated it all the more.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff McM</title>
		<link>http://thisdistractedglobe.com/2007/10/12/dial-m-for-murder-1954/comment-page-1/#comment-1804</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff McM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Oct 2007 09:17:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thisdistractedglobe.com/2007/10/12/dial-m-for-murder-1954/#comment-1804</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s not a first-rate Hitchcock movie but I have a weak spot for the &#039;spouses plotting to murder each other&#039; subgenre of movies.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s not a first-rate Hitchcock movie but I have a weak spot for the &#8216;spouses plotting to murder each other&#8217; subgenre of movies.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

