<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Spellbound (1945)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thisdistractedglobe.com/2007/10/09/spellbound-1945/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thisdistractedglobe.com/2007/10/09/spellbound-1945/</link>
	<description>Film reviews and commentary tonight, before I forget tomorrow</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 17:21:30 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: The guy</title>
		<link>http://thisdistractedglobe.com/2007/10/09/spellbound-1945/comment-page-1/#comment-6303</link>
		<dc:creator>The guy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Oct 2008 04:40:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thisdistractedglobe.com/2007/10/09/spellbound-1945/#comment-6303</guid>
		<description>i thot it was good</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i thot it was good</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fatmir Terziu</title>
		<link>http://thisdistractedglobe.com/2007/10/09/spellbound-1945/comment-page-1/#comment-1882</link>
		<dc:creator>Fatmir Terziu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Oct 2007 07:55:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thisdistractedglobe.com/2007/10/09/spellbound-1945/#comment-1882</guid>
		<description>The eye symbol and the cigarette sign have more to say to the Freudian discovery of the &quot;substitutive relation&quot;. However were has some more interest conflicts in the semiotic context overall, as images and language does not fitting together in many part. As the language of images completes the meaning, a dialogue between Dr. Peterson and her lover is vague. The music and sound effects complete this emptiness.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The eye symbol and the cigarette sign have more to say to the Freudian discovery of the &#8220;substitutive relation&#8221;. However were has some more interest conflicts in the semiotic context overall, as images and language does not fitting together in many part. As the language of images completes the meaning, a dialogue between Dr. Peterson and her lover is vague. The music and sound effects complete this emptiness.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pat Evans</title>
		<link>http://thisdistractedglobe.com/2007/10/09/spellbound-1945/comment-page-1/#comment-1822</link>
		<dc:creator>Pat Evans</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Oct 2007 11:20:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thisdistractedglobe.com/2007/10/09/spellbound-1945/#comment-1822</guid>
		<description>I was about to mention the color shot but I was beaten to this by Damian above.  However, not all prints include this which may be why you didn&#039;t note it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was about to mention the color shot but I was beaten to this by Damian above.  However, not all prints include this which may be why you didn&#8217;t note it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Megan</title>
		<link>http://thisdistractedglobe.com/2007/10/09/spellbound-1945/comment-page-1/#comment-1793</link>
		<dc:creator>Megan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Oct 2007 23:20:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thisdistractedglobe.com/2007/10/09/spellbound-1945/#comment-1793</guid>
		<description>Watched this last night and did not really care for it, Iâ€™m afraid.  But I do agree with you about the score â€” amazing!

I wonder what would have happened if the roles of Bergman &amp; Peck were reversed?  I know it would take some rewrite, but I have a feeling the chemistry might have worked better that way.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Watched this last night and did not really care for it, Iâ€™m afraid.  But I do agree with you about the score â€” amazing!</p>
<p>I wonder what would have happened if the roles of Bergman &#038; Peck were reversed?  I know it would take some rewrite, but I have a feeling the chemistry might have worked better that way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe Valdez</title>
		<link>http://thisdistractedglobe.com/2007/10/09/spellbound-1945/comment-page-1/#comment-1785</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe Valdez</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Oct 2007 04:03:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thisdistractedglobe.com/2007/10/09/spellbound-1945/#comment-1785</guid>
		<description>Damian: I wasn&#039;t aware of the color elements in this flick. Thanks for pointing that out to my dozen or so readers!

Megan: My introduction to MiklÃ³s RÃ³zsa was his score for &lt;em&gt;The Private Life of Sherlock Holmes&lt;/em&gt;, which just blew me away. John Williams could not have given that film a more beautiful score. I think RÃ³zsa&#039;s music captures the &quot;romance&quot; of going to the movies perfectly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Damian: I wasn&#8217;t aware of the color elements in this flick. Thanks for pointing that out to my dozen or so readers!</p>
<p>Megan: My introduction to MiklÃ³s RÃ³zsa was his score for <em>The Private Life of Sherlock Holmes</em>, which just blew me away. John Williams could not have given that film a more beautiful score. I think RÃ³zsa&#8217;s music captures the &#8220;romance&#8221; of going to the movies perfectly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Damian</title>
		<link>http://thisdistractedglobe.com/2007/10/09/spellbound-1945/comment-page-1/#comment-1781</link>
		<dc:creator>Damian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Oct 2007 23:10:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thisdistractedglobe.com/2007/10/09/spellbound-1945/#comment-1781</guid>
		<description>My friend Tucker always used to be amused by the fact that this film shows one of the all-time great screen actors (Gregory Peck) giving a truly awful performance. :)

Personally, I love &lt;i&gt;Spellbound&lt;/i&gt; and the three individuals that you point out who elevate it above B-picture status, Joe, is absolutely correct. I particularly love the penultimate &quot;shot&quot; in the film which, on some prints, even had a brief splash of the color red to heighten its impact (perhaps a reference to the final &quot;shot&quot; of the silent film &lt;i&gt;The Great Train Robbery?)&lt;/i&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My friend Tucker always used to be amused by the fact that this film shows one of the all-time great screen actors (Gregory Peck) giving a truly awful performance. <img src='http://thisdistractedglobe.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Personally, I love <i>Spellbound</i> and the three individuals that you point out who elevate it above B-picture status, Joe, is absolutely correct. I particularly love the penultimate &#8220;shot&#8221; in the film which, on some prints, even had a brief splash of the color red to heighten its impact (perhaps a reference to the final &#8220;shot&#8221; of the silent film <i>The Great Train Robbery?)</i></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
