<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Vanilla Sky (2001)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thisdistractedglobe.com/2007/08/16/vanilla-sky-2001/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thisdistractedglobe.com/2007/08/16/vanilla-sky-2001/</link>
	<description>Film reviews and commentary tonight, before I forget tomorrow</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 17:21:30 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Sedate Me</title>
		<link>http://thisdistractedglobe.com/2007/08/16/vanilla-sky-2001/comment-page-1/#comment-7355</link>
		<dc:creator>Sedate Me</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2009 19:33:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thisdistractedglobe.com/2007/08/16/vanilla-sky-2001/#comment-7355</guid>
		<description>I liked Vanilla Sky and probably would have liked it more with the missing 15 minutes. It just seemed like it was missing a couple of scenes. It was good, but it was so close to being great.

I never saw the original Spanish version, but I&#039;m willing to bet this was largely a case of &quot;made for America&quot; rearing its ugly head. Even in an artistic sci-fi-ish film, only so much thinking is tolerable, especially with such a high profile cast.

The whole Cruz-Cruise romance thing was a distraction that hurt the watchability because it kept pulling you out of the movie make-believe world and into the real make-believe world.

Unfortunately, Cruise is such a self-parody now he&#039;s ruined the chance to see it again and delve deeper into it.  I too suspect I&#039;d see more if I watched it a couple more times.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I liked Vanilla Sky and probably would have liked it more with the missing 15 minutes. It just seemed like it was missing a couple of scenes. It was good, but it was so close to being great.</p>
<p>I never saw the original Spanish version, but I&#8217;m willing to bet this was largely a case of &#8220;made for America&#8221; rearing its ugly head. Even in an artistic sci-fi-ish film, only so much thinking is tolerable, especially with such a high profile cast.</p>
<p>The whole Cruz-Cruise romance thing was a distraction that hurt the watchability because it kept pulling you out of the movie make-believe world and into the real make-believe world.</p>
<p>Unfortunately, Cruise is such a self-parody now he&#8217;s ruined the chance to see it again and delve deeper into it.  I too suspect I&#8217;d see more if I watched it a couple more times.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: matt</title>
		<link>http://thisdistractedglobe.com/2007/08/16/vanilla-sky-2001/comment-page-1/#comment-1354</link>
		<dc:creator>matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Aug 2007 05:33:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thisdistractedglobe.com/2007/08/16/vanilla-sky-2001/#comment-1354</guid>
		<description>I saw the original version of this movie but never got around to watching the non-subtitled edition.I think it was because Tom Cruise as a rich playboy seemed too far-fetched.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I saw the original version of this movie but never got around to watching the non-subtitled edition.I think it was because Tom Cruise as a rich playboy seemed too far-fetched.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
