<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Painted Veil (2006)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thisdistractedglobe.com/2007/06/22/the-painted-veil-2006/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thisdistractedglobe.com/2007/06/22/the-painted-veil-2006/</link>
	<description>Film reviews and commentary tonight, before I forget tomorrow</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 May 2012 03:27:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Grayce</title>
		<link>http://thisdistractedglobe.com/2007/06/22/the-painted-veil-2006/comment-page-1/#comment-29228</link>
		<dc:creator>Grayce</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Sep 2011 23:53:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thisdistractedglobe.com/2007/06/22/the-painted-veil-2006/#comment-29228</guid>
		<description>Just saw the film on dvd. I agree, it deserves more public discussion. Diana Rigg was a delightful surprise. Hoping Norton and Watts, as producers, get mileage.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just saw the film on dvd. I agree, it deserves more public discussion. Diana Rigg was a delightful surprise. Hoping Norton and Watts, as producers, get mileage.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe Valdez</title>
		<link>http://thisdistractedglobe.com/2007/06/22/the-painted-veil-2006/comment-page-1/#comment-1634</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe Valdez</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Sep 2007 18:45:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thisdistractedglobe.com/2007/06/22/the-painted-veil-2006/#comment-1634</guid>
		<description>M: I do believe your appraisal of my article was more articulate than anything in the article. Thank you for sharing your thoughts. Feel free to do so again, particularly if they include praise for the author.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>M: I do believe your appraisal of my article was more articulate than anything in the article. Thank you for sharing your thoughts. Feel free to do so again, particularly if they include praise for the author.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: M. Duran</title>
		<link>http://thisdistractedglobe.com/2007/06/22/the-painted-veil-2006/comment-page-1/#comment-1633</link>
		<dc:creator>M. Duran</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Sep 2007 15:00:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thisdistractedglobe.com/2007/06/22/the-painted-veil-2006/#comment-1633</guid>
		<description>Your own assessment puts your byline on my must read list, as in: &quot;...a great film...one of the decade&#039;s best...sophisticated, sensual and haunting in the way the great romances of the &#039;60s and &#039;70s were...a real labor of love for those involved, and I can&#039;t recommend it enough&quot; should say it for anybody. Among the very best in the decade that will in time be acknowledged.

Congratulations</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your own assessment puts your byline on my must read list, as in: &#8220;&#8230;a great film&#8230;one of the decade&#8217;s best&#8230;sophisticated, sensual and haunting in the way the great romances of the &#8217;60s and &#8217;70s were&#8230;a real labor of love for those involved, and I can&#8217;t recommend it enough&#8221; should say it for anybody. Among the very best in the decade that will in time be acknowledged.</p>
<p>Congratulations</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

